| |
|
|
A metaphor for
linearity is the term ABC, that we are used to taking for an alpha-betical
order. As a linear listing of persons (and sometimes things) it is common,
polite and political correct, because there is no ranking. The term ABC
in our language means
a) the alphabet children are taught, and
b) a basic knowledge about something that must be learnt first, if one wants
to get closer and to work with it, for instance the classes of the non-linear
web-movies.
My work has two aspects of a non-linear web-movie:
a) interactivity - when the user clicks on the centre of the letters, the
letter almost fills the whole screen; I thought about learning, about repeating
and trans-parency of a letter, and about the phenomenon that there is a
flow of letters one takes an element from and does something with it; when
we start learning how to write, we begin with big letters;
b) the way, how the order of the letters changes by chance and without the
inter-action of the viewer.
When you go to the cinema, you see a film once; in exhibitions and on the
web films are running in loops; for me this constant repeating doesn't make
sense. A random factor gives something accidental to a work, like the surface
of an oil pain-ting for instance, it gives a human aspect as well. Strangely
enough the term ABC has three letters, whereas the word alphabet has only
two (A - the alpha and B - the beta of the Greek alphabet). Alpha is used
in bitmaps and movies for an invi-sible channel for creating masks. Beta
stands for the test versions of a software allowed to be used by anyone
as a feedback for the software developer, who wants to get a general idea
of the problems having occurred. Gamma - the third letter of the Greek alphabet
- is the name of colour management in images and for monitors. Correcting
the gamma means changing the position and - saying it more easily - the
amount of the white. In this work the letters are digital photos of neon
signs on a metal holder. I guess I saw them without their original context
left on a building that had been a food store once. As the neon shine is
not visible on a photo I had to change the gamma a bit in my work to make
that light spread out on the letters and the metal.
|
|
|
| |
|
|
Révész collects photos of things and situations that attract his attention.
Not following a certain concept, this can be photos he shoots himself, or
a collection of postcards, personal photos of a friend or even photos found
in journals. A typical language of images, that could possibly lead way
to interpretation, he thus avoids. Even images that are used with a piece
of art at a later time are not really selected, they are rather picked out
by mere chance. The collection of such material is not be seen in context
with an artistic approach. It only receives meaning when he computerizes,
compiles and works on it for one specific piece of art. Sometimes Révész
combines it with elements generated by computers. Throughout the last years
he used a digital camera, which enables him to take short video sequences.
To my opinion Révész chose the letters ABC not only for the reasons he mentioned
in his own text above, but also because of their triviality and their lack
of a deeper meaning. The symbols mean nothing but what they stand for. By
doing so he forces the viewer to concentrate on the symbols and on their
movement on the monitor; he avoids associative ideas, that would lead the
viewer away from what might be Révész' interests: to address and link common
and antagonistic issues of linear and non-linear codes and make them a subject
of discussion.
Because the letters mean nothing but what they stand for, they can be used
universally. Révész has listed a general use of ABC as a concept and its
single symbols, applicable for all groups of population and areas of life,
and one speci-fically applicable for the software/web area. In these areas
ABC and its elements appear as signatures with which we (all or only certain
groups) deal with on a daily basis. Something we always meet, leaves our
attention, as we tend to notice only deviations of the normal. The letters
in the end-product do not appear as pre-requisite of many kinds or - if
so - only as a triviality. They are part of the foun-ding stones of our
world. Aged for millennia, yet highly progressive, and then like today of
highest importance.
For Révész such apparent discrepancies are interesting phenomena, like any
anta-gonism in general. In many of his works we can find them as an important
issue, especially when he displays pairs. He relieves the letters from not
being noticed by letting them change into an other and different colored
symbol of the ABC, displaying them as neon signs with a different flash-frequency.
With their dimens-ional order, their colorful light, their non- textuality,
they remind of a picture, on the other hand in every one of the letter fields
a short "letter movie" is presented. Thus, ABC could be described as a picture
made of movies. A picture or a scene is synchronized and therefore it is
non-linear. We view it as an entity and - by mov-ing our eyes between the
single parts of the picture - we try to gain an overview of the interrelation
of the single parts, thus decoding the picture. By creating a sequence of
letters or words of a text or even a sequence of pictures of a film it merges
from a non-linear into a linear - chronological - act. However, the single
frames of a film are pictures and non-linear, their chronological succession
is linear.
The content of a film is another genre, where linearity and synchronism
and therefore non-linearity meet. Normally levels of different paces exist
in a film; these need to be decoded: Moving parts with their related pace
successively, stills are being decoded like a picture. With the use of a
computer it has become possible to intervene with the linear movement of
a film and - by doing so - influence its course. This can be done by so
called interactivity but also by a chance factor. Both possibilities Révész
has built into his work. On the one hand the user can view the single "letter
movie" in full screen size, in which he follows our way of reading and writing
from top left to bottom right. That means that if you start clicking the
first film top left, you can only see that part of letters that fits into
the size of the letter frame - the remaining part is hidden behind the following
letters. Only when the last letter frame bottom right has been clicked the
letter is fully visible in the foreground.
This alludes to the non-linearity of a picture for only in something synchronized
- a scene - one can steer to different parts, e.g. by use of a mouse, on
the other hand it displays the linearity of a script code. But we uncover
the letters step by step in a linear way. ABC, however, does not carry a
text, for the letters only display themselves, as the succession A - B -
C is no longer observed, every attempt to interpret the term ABC is stopped
abruptly. What I have described as "letter movie" are frames in a succession,
however, they are presented at different paces (something that is only possible
in a computer-generated work). Sometimes we can see a letter for a longer
time span, sometimes it vanishes quickly to make place for another one.
There is no real movement in the film: with the frame only the letter changes,
there is no continuous meaning, no action, no story; the succession of letters
is ad libitum.It seems to me that the chance factor that operates the little
films enhances this effect.
Révész mentions capital letters a school beginner has to deal with. Teaching
the ABC to little girls and boys shows how important and basic for life
the alphabet is. Children see the elements of the ABC as images first, then
they learn to use them linearly. By doing so they get used to the text mode
modern societies are based on, they are on the threshold to become a member
of them. In the scientific-made world of modern societies observation and
experience are analysed rationally and acquired by their conception, that
means abstractly. Letters belong to the level of abstract thinking. They
are the basis for transferring an image into text. In many cases we are
not able to understand images without text. We are permanently transferring
non-linear scenes to terms and sequences of words. This is the way that
fits to the structure of our world. But doing so we notice very quickly
how difficult it is to express in linear words what we see as a non-linear
image and that we are not able to create a scenic co-existence by means
of a textual one-after-the-other.
Révész' work ABC seems to have the question at its core, what art might
be, and which way to show the result of the artist's observations so that
his piece of work can be called art. It is a question of form and not a
question of content; it's a question of the role of antagonisms, of image
and movement, time, chance… Basic questions of art.
Heidrun Quinque-Wessels' text was translated by Frank Siebold
|
|
|